This study is not the final word on whether older patients should be treated aggressively. Those who choose watchful waiting tend to be sicker in the first place and simply cannot withstand aggressive treatment, experts caution. Co-investigator of the study, Dr. Gary Hudes, emphasized that the study was conducted to address this concern but still admitted that illness, "could be a confounding factor that would make you wonder about the results."
Still, the findings are bound to add to the heated debate on the merits of watchful waiting. For the most part, it seems, a man who is under the age of 65 with prostate cancer benefits from surgery to remove the cancer. Older men are more likely to die with prostate cancer than from it, so there is less reason to go through treatment. For these men—and those who have less aggressive tumors—a watchful waiting approach has become somewhat normal, as doctors can monitor the growth of the cancer and take action only when things seem to be getting worse.
"Some prostate cancers grow so slowly that they never become life-threatening, especially in elderly men who may die of other causes before the cancer causes problems," said Wong. "But other men develop complications and die from their cancer, making the decision to treat quite difficult."
The results of this study highlight the fact that doctors and patients need to consider all factors when discussing treatment options for prostate cancer.
"The take-home message is that for men who have a reasonable life expectancy, treatment should be considered," said Hudes. "You should think long and hard about watchful waiting before deciding that it is right for you."